Medical malpractice claims are nuanced in that there are a variety of facts that must be analyzed to make certain that your claim has merit and is permitted to be filed with a court. If you or a loved one has been a victim of medical malpractice, you have a specified time period in which you are able to bring a claim. If you fail to file a claim within that timeframe, it is quite possible that you will not be able to do so at any point and you will not be permitted to recover for your pain and suffering. This page is intended to provide a brief overview of what you may expect if you are pursuing a medical malpractice claim in Tennessee; however, the best course of action to take if you are considering doing so is to consult with an experienced medical malpractice attorney licensed in Tennessee. An experienced attorney will be able to guide you through the specifics of the laws that are more finely tuned with the details of your medical malpractice claim and explore whether your claim has the requisite merit to be filed in court.
Suing for Medical Malpractice in Tennessee
In Tennessee, you may bring a medical malpractice case against a medical care provider, including a medical doctor, nurse, physical therapist, and mental health care professional. The law in Tennessee places a set time period for which a medical malpractice claim may be filed. If named as a defendant in a medical malpractice case, the law in Tennessee allows the defense of modified comparative negligence to be used which allows a damage award to be reduced in proportion to the percentage of fault assigned by a court.
When it comes to medical malpractice claims, most cases settle out of court prior to the case advancing to the trial stage of litigation. Tennessee is one of a few states that refuses to place a limit on damages that may be awarded to a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case.
How long do I have to file a medical malpractice case in Tennessee?
The first step in bringing a claim of medical malpractice against a healthcare provider is making certain that you are permitted to do so. The law in Tennessee mandates that an action for personal injury must be filed within one year from the date the cause of action accrues. 
This time limitation is known as the “statute of limitations” which refers to the time period from the time an injury occurs or is discovered to the final date on which a medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed. If you decide to bring an action after the statute of limitations has passed, a court can dismiss your case and you will be left with no recourse. The reason behind placing a time limitation on when you may file a medical malpractice claim is sound. A court is interested in credible evidence in order to establish a cause of action. As time passes, it is possible that the crucial evidence that would initially help bolster your case would become less compelling.
The law in Tennessee does provide a special exception to the one-year statute of limitations rule whereby the one-year clock does not begin to run until your injury has been, or should have been, discovered. However, at no point may a medical malpractice lawsuit be filed beyond the three-year mark, regardless of the timing of discovery.
Additionally, any party initiating a health care liability case must give sixty days advance notice to the implicated health care providers before filing suit.
In Tennessee Medical Malpractice Cases, who is Responsible?
In Tennessee, a medical malpractice lawsuit means an action for damages for personal injury or death as a result of any medical malpractice by a health care provider, whether based on tort or contract law.
Those that can be held responsible due to being included in the definition of a “medical care provider” include:
- certified registered nurse anesthetist
- physician's assistant
- physical therapist
- nursing home
- community mental health center
When bringing a medical malpractice claim against a healthcare provider, the burden of proof rests with you and you must prove:
The degree of skill and learning ordinarily possessed and used by members of the profession of the medical care provider in good standing, engaged in the same type of practice or specialty in the locality in which he or she practices or in a similar locality;
That the medical care provider failed to act in accordance with that standard; and
That as a proximate result thereof the injured person suffered injuries that would not otherwise have occurred.
What if I am partially to blame? Can I Still Recover Money for Tennessee Medical Malpractice?
Tennessee, along with 32 other states recognizes the doctrine of modified comparative fault.  The doctrine allows a court to assign a percentage of blame to each party involved in the lawsuit and any damage award is reduced in proportion to your apportioned fault. Of the 33 states that follow a modified version of comparative fault, Tennessee is one of 12 states (Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia) that follow a 50% rule where you are only able to recover damages for an injury if a court determines that your apportionment of fault for your own injury is 49% or less.
For example, imagine you become sick after ingesting medication that was prescribed to you by your doctor. A court finds that your sickness was caused by a combination of a disclosed allergy and alcohol that you consumed while on the medication. The court ultimately finds that the doctor should never have prescribed that specific type of medication due to your allergy and assigns the defendant 60% of the blame while assigning 40% of the blame to you for not following the medication's instructions when you consumed alcohol while on the medication. Since you were awarded 40% of the blame, you would be able to recover a portion of damages because you were not found to have been 50% or more at fault for your injury. If the court awarded $100,000 in damages, you would be able to recover $60,000 after the apportioned 40% of fault is applied.
Some states do not adhere to a modified form of comparative fault and instead follow a doctrine of pure comparative fault where a plaintiff is able to recover for damages even if they are found to have been 99% at fault for their injury. An argument against the adoption of pure comparative fault is that it is contrary to the nature and purpose of the legal system to allow a plaintiff who has substantially contributed to their own injury to recover damages for any portion of their loss. This is a reason why Tennessee decided to adopt a modified system.
Are there medical malpractice recovery caps in Tennessee?
If you are ultimately successful in your medical malpractice claim, you will be awarded damages in accordance with the doctrine of comparative fault. The term “damages” is synonymous with a monetary award which is used to compensate the plaintiff for the injuries they sustained as a result of the plaintiff's negligence. There are two main types of damage awards you may receive:
Compensatory Damages are meant to place you in the position you would have been in had your injury never occurred as they are meant to compensate you for your injury. Compensatory damages are usually split into two categories – actual damages and general damages.
Actual damages reimburse you for out-of-pocket items that can easily be accounted for like:
- Medical bills
- Prescription fees
- Nursing costs
- Physical therapy costs
- Wages lost from an inability to work
General damages compensate you for occurrences that are hard to properly value. For example:
- Pain and suffering
- Loss of consortium
- Loss of enjoyment of life
- Future medical costs
- Loss of future wages
Punitive Damages are different from compensatory damages in that they are intended to punish the defendant rather than compensate the plaintiff. In Tennessee, punitive damages may be awarded by the court only when you prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant against whom punitive damages are sought acted maliciously, intentionally, fraudulently or recklessly. 
The law in Tennessee places a limit on the amount of punitive damages that a court may award which is the greater of two times the amount of compensatory damages or $500,000. 
Expert witness reporting and testimony
The law in Tennessee requires you to prove by competent expert testimony the recognized standard of acceptable professional practice in the profession and the specialty thereof, if any, that the defendant physician practices in the community in which he practices or in a similar community at the time the alleged injury or wrongful action occurred. 
Having an expert provide testimony that supports the claims you are making against a healthcare provider in your medical malpractice case is the best way to substantiate the merits of your claim. It is the expert that will be able to establish that the defendant either lacked or failed to exercise the requisite degree of knowledge or skill held by healthcare providers in their field and that as a proximate result of the lack of knowledge or skill or the failure to exercise this degree of care, the plaintiff suffered injuries that would not otherwise have been incurred.
To be deemed a competent expert witness, the person must be licensed to practice in the state or a contiguous bordering state a profession or specialty which would make their expert testimony relevant to the issues in the case and had practiced this profession or specialty in one of those states during the year preceding the date that the alleged injury or wrongful act occurred.
Are some parties immune from medical negligence cases?
Some states provide absolute immunity to their municipalities, cities in towns when it comes to actions of personal injury.
The law in Tennessee has waived its immunity when faced with a claim of medical malpractice. However, the State is immune from potential punitive damages. If the State is found to be liable for medical malpractice, damages are limited to $1,000,000 per occurrence. 
Governmental entities are required to purchase liability insurance in the amount of $350,000 per occurrence. 
Settling medical malpractice cases in Tennessee
Seeing a case through to the end of a trial can take an extraordinary amount of time, money and resources. For those reasons, it is not uncommon for a case to settle prior to trial. The law in Tennessee does not require mandatory arbitration, mediation, or the submission of your medical malpractice case to a screening panel as a form of alternative dispute resolution prior to the claim reaching the trial stage of litigation.
However, if both parties are interested in reaching a settlement in lieu of going to court, a form of alternative dispute resolution may be helpful.
Some common types of alternative dispute resolution methods are mediation and arbitration.
Mediation is a settlement conference that is run by a trained mediator where any settlement negotiated is agreed to by both sides.
Arbitration is where the involved parties agree upon an arbitrator who will serve as the judge and jury and decide issues of fault and award damages.
Litigating medical negligence cases in Tennessee
A claim for medical malpractice in Tennessee is initiated by preparing a Complaint and Summons that must be served on the named defendants in your case. The defendant is then required to file a document that is called the Answer which provides responses to the allegations you made in the complaint and will also list the affirmative defenses that will be used.
Initiating the Case
If the parties to a medical malpractice lawsuit are unable to reach a settlement, the claim will proceed to trial.
The Tennessee court system consists of the following courts: the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Criminal Appeals, Circuit Court, Chancery Court, General Sessions Court, Probate Court, and Juvenile Court. 
In Tennessee, a civil lawsuit begins with the filing of a complaint with the clerk of the court. The law in Tennessee then requires that once a complaint is filed, the court clerk will issue a summons which will be served upon the named defendants by the Sheriff.
A complaint should include:
- A statement in ordinary and concise language of facts showing that the court has jurisdiction of the claim and is the proper venue and that the plaintiff is entitled to relief,
- A demand for the relief to which the plaintiff considers himself entitled
A civil summons lets the named defendants know that a lawsuit has been filed against them. The complaint and summons must then be delivered to all named defendants in the lawsuit. Upon receipt, the defendants have 30 days to file an Answer which admits and/or denies statements made in the complaint. The Answer should include:
- Reasons for denial of the relief sought by the plaintiff
- Affirmative defenses
- Affirmative relief sought by the defendant
- Whether there will be a counter-claim, set-off, cross-claim, or third-party claim
- The address of the defendant or their attorney
Preparing for Litigation
After the disclosures have been made and the complaint, summons and answer have been filed in the appropriate court, the parties may begin the discovery process. Discovery is a procedure designed to allow disclosure between both sides of a lawsuit which allows both sides to know what to expect at trial.
The law in Tennessee allows each side to obtain discovery by:
- oral examination or written questions;
- written interrogatories;
- requests for admission;
- request for production of documents or other information;
- physical and mental examinations
A deposition is a fact-finding tool where the opposing side is permitted to ask questions of the witness being deposed who is under oath. The deposition does not usually take place in a courtroom. Instead, the questions are asked in an attorney's office where attorneys are present in order to help advise their client on how to answer certain questions as well as to make objections if necessary. Through the question and answer session, opposing counsel will try to find out what facts the opposing party believes to be true and what facts they may be exaggerating. A court reporter is usually present during a deposition.
At the trial, any part or all of a deposition may be used against any party who was present or represented at the taking of the deposition.
Written interrogatories are written questions sent to the opposing side that request answers which will be used to establish the facts that will be presented once the case goes to trial.
Production of documents is a request made to the opposing side whereby tangible documents are sought. In a medical malpractice case, an example of a request for production of documents would be a request to view the medical records of the claimant.
Request for admission is a set of statements drafted by one side and sent to the other where the receiver must answer in the affirmative or the negative. In a medical malpractice case, an example of a request for admission would be a statement like, “the defense has no evidence to support a basis that the claimant caused their own injuries.” If the defense answers in the negative, the claimant would know that the defense is intending to proffer some type of evidence in an attempt to prove that they were at least partially to blame for their own injury.
In a medical malpractice case, it is possible that the person bringing the claim will need to be medically evaluated in order to corroborate that the injury being complained of does in fact exist.
The law in Tennessee does not mandate that claims of medical malpractice first be heard during an arbitration proceeding prior to the case reaching the trial stage of litigation. Therefore, if the involved parties are not able to come to a settlement agreement, the case will go to trial.
During a trial, all admissible evidence will be presented to the 'trier of fact' who is a person or group of people who hear testimony and review evidence in order to issue a ruling in favor of one party or another. There are two potential triers of fact in a personal injury case in the state of Tennessee: a judge or a jury. In Tennessee, a civil jury usually consists of 12 members and all 12 members must agree in order for a verdict to be decided. The parties may, however, stipulate that a jury shall consist of any number less than twelve.
To choose a jury, a procedure known as “voir dire” is conducted whereby attorneys ask potential jurors questions in order to determine what biases the panel members may have in favor or against the cast being brought before the court.
Once this process is completed, both sides will decide what parties they would like to remove from juror consideration. A potential juror is not allowed to be excluded from jury service because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or economic status. Once each side finishes announcing the parties they wish to have removed, the jury is impaneled.
In Tennessee, a person is considered to be qualified to be a juror if they are:
- A registered voter
- A citizen of the United States
- At least 18 years of age
- A resident of the State of Tennessee and of the county in which he or she may be summoned for jury service
After the jury selection is completed, opening statements will begin. An opening statement is an outline of what each side thinks the evidence will be and is offered to help jurors understand and follow the evidence during the trial.
From there, the plaintiff will begin to argue their case. The plaintiff will call witnesses at this time and each witness will be questioned by the plaintiff's attorney and then likely cross-examined by the
opposing side's attorney. After all the plaintiff's witnesses have been called and evidence has been presented, the plaintiff will rest their case.
Once the plaintiff finishes the presentation of their case, the defense will begin to present their evidence. The defense will present the physician's side of the case and attempt to show why negligence was not involved in creating the patient's injury.
Once both sides have argued their cases, closing arguments will take place. During closing arguments, each side's attorney will explain to the jury what they believe the evidence proves. In the final argument, each side will summarize the facts that were presented during the trial and attempt to show how they support their client's case. The closing arguments allow the jury to better understand the case.
Finally, jury instructions are then given by the judge to the jury and the jury is then free to deliberate and come back with a finding.
Many times the losing side in a medical malpractice case will opt to appeal a decision from the lower court. An appeal is a legal proceeding which allows a higher court to review the decision rendered by a lower court. The Court of Appeals differs from the lower court in that it does not hear testimony from witnesses and does not determine facts. Instead, during an appeal, the court decides whether the trial Court made an error of law or made a factual determination unsupported by any evidence which led to the rendering of the verdict.
To appeal the decision of a lower court, you must file a Notice of Appeal with the clerk of the circuit court that entered the judgment no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the original judgment. 
How to find the best Tennessee Medical Malpractice Lawyer for your case
Initiating any legal proceeding can be daunting and overwhelming, especially if it is being brought against a high-powered doctor or hospital. It is likely that you would rather focus on healing your injury and seeking the proper medical treatment than worry about contacting your healthcare provider's attorney or looking for experts that can support your claim. This is why it is important to find legal representation that can take your mind off of the legalese so that you can focus on getting yourself better.
One of the main motivating factors in bringing a medical malpractice lawsuit against a healthcare provider that caused your injury is to receive proper compensation for the pain, suffering and losses you have likely endured. After all, why should you be forced to go out-of-pocket for an injury that was caused by someone else? In order to increase your chances of success in your medical malpractice case, it is very important to find competent and highly skilled legal representation.
When looking to hire legal representation, it is important to remember that the attorney will be working for you – not the other way around. Do not let an attorney or firm pressure you into hiring them on the spot. Take your time and interview more than one law firm to make sure that the counsel you end up with is the right fit for you and your family.
Make certain to seek out an attorney or law firm that has extensive experience and knowledge with cases that are similar to your own. Do not be afraid to ask an attorney or law firm their level of experience. It may also be wise to ask if they have ever litigated a case similar to yours and whether or not they were successful. If they have had experience with cases with facts similar to yours, they may be able to give insight into how long the case may last and what your expected damages may be. They can also inform you of the estimated cost of litigation.
If the attorney or firm you are interviewing has a large case load, you will want to make sure that your case gets sufficient attention. Ask the firm or attorney if they have the time to focus on your case.
You may want to get a feel for if you actually like the attorney or law firm that you are interviewing. While you do not have to be best friends with your legal counsel – in fact, it is best not to be – you need to decide if the person or people representing you are people you want to be in constant contact with day in and day out. Communication between attorneys and clients is incredibly important. You should also ask your potential attorney or firm how they communicate with their clients. People communicate in different ways which can lead to frustration if the methods used between the parties do not mesh. Your attorney should adapt their communication methods to fit your needs.
Some notable medical malpractice law decisions from Tennessee
These cases represent awards to plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases in Tennessee. These results are in no way a guarantee that subsequent, similar, cases will see the same results.
Johnson v. Dyersburg Regional Medical Center
A medical malpractice lawsuit was filed against Dyersburg Regional Medical Center, Joseph Flagge, M.D.; and Alan Hopkins by the parents of Jonathan Reynolds - David Reynolds and Debbie Flowers.
Jonathan Reynolds visited Upon This Rock Amusement with the intention of playing laser tag. However, Jonathan injured himself when he fell on an exposed nail head. He was then taken to Dyersburg Regional Medical Center where Dr. Flagge and Hopkins treated him. It was then that Dr. Hopkins and other medical personnel failed to take proper precautions to avoid infection, including the failure to administer necessary and appropriate antibiotics and other medicines.
Jonathan was discharged the same day of his injury but was then admitted into the medical center two days later with excruciating pain and redness and swelling that was steadily moving up his leg. Dr. Randy Isaacs, failed at that time to properly diagnose the flesh-eating bacteria that was causing Jonathan's pain. A few days after the second trip to Dyersburg Regional Medical Center, another doctor determined that Jonathan's condition was significant.
At trial, it was argued that not only did Jonathan suffer severe physical injuries from the hospital's negligence with most of the flesh from his knee to his groin decomposing, requiring extensive tissue removal and skin grafts, but he also suffered severe brain injuries. Jonathan's condition caused him to slip into a coma for two weeks where he suffered from seizures that caused permanent brain damage.
The original medical malpractice case ended in a mistrial but was later reheard. After the conclusion of the second trial, the jury returned a verdict for a judgment of $7.8 million.
Hill v. OB-GYN
The plaintiffs, Courtney and Robert Hill, filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Courtney's OB-GYN for failing to properly diagnose breast cancer.
Courtney Hill originally called her OB-GYNs office and reported to the receptionist that she had found a lump in her breast which had persisted for two months with possible dimpling and asked whether she should come in immediately.
At that time, a nurse gave Courtney's message in writing to her doctor with a question to the doctor of whether the patient should have a mammogram. The doctor replied in the negative and told Courtney to come to the office in two weeks – when Courtney already had a scheduled appointment.
At the regularly scheduled appointment, the doctor performed a scheduled procedure and had to be reminded to examine the complained of lump. A palpation examination of the lump was conducted and the doctor informed the plaintiff that it was a cyst and nothing to worry about. An ultrasound was never ordered.
Later, after becoming pregnant, the plaintiff was seen in the same doctor's office on 16 occasions without further evaluation or testing.
The complained of lump became larger after giving birth and the plaintiff attempted to see the doctor but could not due to the doctor's busy schedule. She then scheduled an appointment with the doctor's partner, who examined the breasts, found a suspicious mass and immediately ordered a mammogram and ultrasound, which confirmed a 4 cm mass. A biopsy the next day proved breast cancer.
Ultimately, the plaintiff's treatment included nine to ten separate rounds of chemotherapy, a lumpectomy, a complete hysterectomy and radiation treatment.
At trial, the doctor argued that she complied with acceptable standard of medical care through her evaluation of the lump by palpation alone. The jury did not agree and awarded the Plaintiffs a total of $23.6 million in damages.
 Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-116
 McIntyre v. Balentine, 833 S.W.2d 52
 Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-104
 Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-104
 Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-115(a)
 Tenn. Code Ann. § 9-8-307
 Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-20-403
 Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-18-302
 Tenn. Appellate Rules, Rule 4